Xentir Media Source-backed AI & tech
LIVE INTELLIGENCE · part of the Xentir AI Index

GLM-4.7 vs Qwen3-Max

GLM-4.7 OPEN WEIGHTS · Z.ai (Zhipu AI), released 2025-12-22
Qwen3-Max · Alibaba, released 2025-09-24

“Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub'. Published online at epoch.ai. Retrieved from 'https://epoch.ai/benchmarks' [online resource].” · epoch.ai/benchmarks · Licensed CC BY 4.0 · data last verified 2026-09-09 · Methodology · Data Sources

GLM-4.7 leads on more of the 5 benchmarks where both are measured — GLM-4.7 on 4, Qwen3-Max on 1. The remaining 4 of 9 tracked benchmarks cannot be compared: 3 have a result for only one of the two models, 1 for neither. Nothing on this page is estimated to fill those in.

Head-to-head

Measured on 5 of 9 tracked benchmarks for both models — GLM-4.7 leads on 4, Qwen3-Max leads on 1.

BenchmarkGLM-4.7 Qwen3-MaxLeads
Epoch Capabilities Index (ECI)143.5142.4GLM-4.7
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measuredNot measuredNot measured on both
GPQA Diamond0.8330.726GLM-4.7
MATH Level 5Not measured0.971Comparison unavailable — GLM-4.7 has no published result
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250.8330.733GLM-4.7
FrontierMath0.024 (zai-org)Not measuredComparison unavailable — Qwen3-Max has no published result
FrontierMath Tier 40.000 (zai-org)Not measuredComparison unavailable — Qwen3-Max has no published result
SimpleQA Verified0.3220.487Qwen3-Max
Chess Puzzles0.0600.040GLM-4.7
Benchmark results measure specific tasks and should not be treated as a universal measure of model quality. A model with no row here for a benchmark has not been measured on it — that is left blank, never estimated.

What remains uncertain

A missing result means Xentir has not found one published by the source it cites, not that the model performs badly. See Data Sources.

Full profiles

GLM-4.7 → · Qwen3-Max → · the full AI Model Rankings table