LIVE INTELLIGENCE · part of the Xentir AI Index

Gemini 2.5 Pro (Jun 2025) vs GLM-5

Name: Gemini 2.5 Pro (Jun 2025) vs GLM-5 — benchmark results
Creator: Epoch AI
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Gemini 2.5 Pro (Jun 2025) · Google DeepMind, released 2025-06-17
GLM-5 OPEN WEIGHTS · Z.ai (Zhipu AI), released 2026-02-11

“Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub'. Published online at epoch.ai. Retrieved from 'https://epoch.ai/benchmarks' [online resource].” · epoch.ai/benchmarks · Licensed CC BY 4.0 · data last verified 2026-09-09 · Methodology · Data Sources

GLM-5 leads on more of the 7 benchmarks where both are measured — Gemini 2.5 Pro (Jun 2025) on 3, GLM-5 on 4. The remaining 2 of 9 tracked benchmarks cannot be compared: 0 have a result for only one of the two models, 2 for neither. Nothing on this page is estimated to fill those in.

Head-to-head

Measured on 7 of 9 tracked benchmarks for both models — Gemini 2.5 Pro (Jun 2025) leads on 3, GLM-5 leads on 4.

Benchmark	Gemini 2.5 Pro (Jun 2025)	GLM-5	Leads
Epoch Capabilities Index (ECI)	145.3	145.9	GLM-5
SWE-bench Verified	0.576	0.721	GLM-5
GPQA Diamond	0.853	0.878	GLM-5
MATH Level 5	Not measured	Not measured	Not measured on both
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025	0.842	0.800	Gemini 2.5 Pro (Jun 2025)
FrontierMath	0.141	0.164	GLM-5
FrontierMath Tier 4	0.042	0.021	Gemini 2.5 Pro (Jun 2025)
SimpleQA Verified	Not measured	Not measured	Not measured on both
Chess Puzzles	0.200	0.100	Gemini 2.5 Pro (Jun 2025)

Benchmark results measure specific tasks and should not be treated as a universal measure of model quality. A model with no row here for a benchmark has not been measured on it — that is left blank, never estimated.

What remains uncertain

2 tracked benchmarks have no published result for either model.

A missing result means Xentir has not found one published by the source it cites, not that the model performs badly. See Data Sources.

Full profiles

Gemini 2.5 Pro (Jun 2025) → · GLM-5 → · the full AI Model Rankings table