Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) vs Llama 3.3 70B
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) · Google DeepMind, released 2024-05-14
Llama 3.3 70B OPEN WEIGHTS · Meta AI, released 2024-12-06
“Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub'. Published online at epoch.ai. Retrieved from 'https://epoch.ai/benchmarks' [online resource].” · epoch.ai/benchmarks · Licensed CC BY 4.0 · data last verified 2026-09-09 · Methodology · Data Sources
Llama 3.3 70B leads on more of the 4 benchmarks where both are measured — Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) on 1, Llama 3.3 70B on 3. The remaining 5 of 9 tracked benchmarks cannot be compared: 0 have a result for only one of the two models, 5 for neither. Nothing on this page is estimated to fill those in.
Head-to-head
Measured on 4 of 9 tracked benchmarks for both models — Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads on 1, Llama 3.3 70B leads on 3.
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Llama 3.3 70B | Leads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index (ECI) | 126.9 | 127.3 | Llama 3.3 70B |
| SWE-bench Verified | Not measured | Not measured | Not measured on both |
| GPQA Diamond | 0.459 | 0.474 | Llama 3.3 70B |
| MATH Level 5 | 0.407 | 0.416 | Llama 3.3 70B |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.068 | 0.051 | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
| FrontierMath | Not measured | Not measured | Not measured on both |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | Not measured | Not measured | Not measured on both |
| SimpleQA Verified | Not measured | Not measured | Not measured on both |
| Chess Puzzles | Not measured | Not measured | Not measured on both |
What remains uncertain
- 5 tracked benchmarks have no published result for either model.
A missing result means Xentir has not found one published by the source it cites, not that the model performs badly. See Data Sources.
Full profiles
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) → · Llama 3.3 70B → · the full AI Model Rankings table