Xentir Media Source-backed AI & tech
LIVE INTELLIGENCE · part of the Xentir AI Index

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview)

Claude Opus 4.5 · Anthropic, released 2025-11-24
Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) · Alibaba, released 2026-04-20

“Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub'. Published online at epoch.ai. Retrieved from 'https://epoch.ai/benchmarks' [online resource].” · epoch.ai/benchmarks · Licensed CC BY 4.0 · data last verified 2026-07-26 · Methodology · Data Sources

Head-to-head

Measured on 8 of 9 tracked benchmarks for both models — Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) leads on 6, tied on 2.

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview)Leads
Epoch Capabilities Index (ECI)149.6149.7Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview)
SWE-bench Verified0.7670.767Tied
GPQA Diamond0.860 (32k)0.891Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview)
MATH Level 5Not measuredNot measuredNot measured on both
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250.861 (32k)0.911Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview)
FrontierMath0.2070.231Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview)
FrontierMath Tier 40.0420.042Tied
SimpleQA Verified0.418 (32k)0.569Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview)
Chess Puzzles0.120 (32k)0.170Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview)
Benchmark results measure specific tasks and should not be treated as a universal measure of model quality. A model with no row here for a benchmark has not been measured on it — that is left blank, never estimated.

Full profiles

Claude Opus 4.5 → · Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) → · the full AI Model Rankings table