Xentir Media Source-backed AI & tech
LIVE INTELLIGENCE · part of the Xentir AI Index

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4

Claude Haiku 4.5 · Anthropic, released 2025-10-15
Claude Opus 4 · Anthropic, released 2025-05-22

“Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub'. Published online at epoch.ai. Retrieved from 'https://epoch.ai/benchmarks' [online resource].” · epoch.ai/benchmarks · Licensed CC BY 4.0 · data last verified 2026-07-26 · Methodology · Data Sources

Head-to-head

Measured on 6 of 9 tracked benchmarks for both models — Claude Haiku 4.5 leads on 3, Claude Opus 4 leads on 3.

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 Claude Opus 4Leads
Epoch Capabilities Index (ECI)142.9142.9Claude Opus 4
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured0.707Not measured on both
GPQA Diamond0.712 (32k)0.763 (16k)Claude Opus 4
MATH Level 50.964 (32k)0.850Claude Haiku 4.5
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250.667 (32k)0.644 (27k)Claude Haiku 4.5
FrontierMath0.059 (32k)0.045Claude Haiku 4.5
FrontierMath Tier 40.021 (32k)0.042 (27k)Claude Opus 4
SimpleQA Verified0.059 (32k)Not measuredNot measured on both
Chess PuzzlesNot measuredNot measuredNot measured on both
Benchmark results measure specific tasks and should not be treated as a universal measure of model quality. A model with no row here for a benchmark has not been measured on it — that is left blank, never estimated.

Full profiles

Claude Haiku 4.5 → · Claude Opus 4 → · the full AI Model Rankings table